Brain Sex

Yeah, you wish this was about sexual fantasies.....

Monday, June 05, 2006

In Response to Calls for an Encore

Recently on The History Channel, on the series Digging for the Truth, host Josh Berstein (CEO/owner of Boulder Outdoor Survival School) embarked to test three primary pillars of contention in Dan Brown's The DaVinci Code (DVC). For those who have read the book, these three claims are the existence of the Priory of Scion, evidence and record of Jesus and Mary Magdelene's marriage in the Dead Sea Scrolls of the Essenes, and evidence of Jesus and Mary's DNA transmitted over the centuries via the royal bloodline of the Merovingians (France 475 - 750 A.D./C.E.) In the series when these claims are put up to brutal scientific inquiry, especially DNA testing of Merovingian Queen Aregonde's remains, Brown's claims come up very, very wanting. Brown was wise to write his supposed tome as fiction in the form of a novel. For if he ever endeavored to claim this as fact, instead of being the celebrity he enjoys today, he would be a laughing stock.

Nevertheless, Brown is a multi-millionaire via combined sales of his book, the feature film, and now -- the video game. After all is said and done, people (the masses) prefer lies to the truth. It is one thing to write fiction in the form of novel in order to educate. That is the story, setting, and characters are fictional; but the thesis is based on facts. For example, I present to you The Ahriman Gate, and The Facade. But, it is entirely another to write fiction knowing full well that it could never, ever be presented as fact. Knowing full well that it is practically a piece of cake to make a buck (millions) off the engineered depravity and ignorance of the general populace. Ain't America great! This is capitalism at it's best.

Contrast the above stated with another literary work. This work similar to DVC speaks of something not entirely evident to the general populace. Call it a conspiracy if you wish. If it is a conspiracy, it is only because and a direct symptom of the above mentioned engineered depravity of mass minds. The difference here, is that this particular work claims to not be fiction. In fact, it boldly claims to be fact based on arduous research of some 15+ years. Readers of this combination work of history, government, and biblical theology have described it as "In the spirit of Ellul and Tolstoy... a powerful and haunting book that will challenge your perception of authority and make you rethink the last 400 years of history... fours years of post-graduate work at a university that should, but does not exist... essential knowledge for which we have been waiting these last six thousand years... will shock your sense of history as no other contemporary book can..." Can DVC make these claims? Can DVC cause difficulty to "restrain the enthusiasm which this work engenders in the reader?" Not on your life.

For all the praise given to this work, why is it not a bestseller? Simple, for the very same reasons that DVC is. Also, it did not help that this work first published in 1999, and enjoying some measure of success had the plug literally pulled on it shortly after 9/11. You see, the original publisher of this work was HarperCollins. Guess who the owner of this publisher is? That's right, Rupert Murdoch. The same guy who is responsible for Fox T.V. Network, and most prominently The Fox News Channel. Does anything more need to be explained here? To be sure, I will present you with the author's of this fine and absolutely timeless work own blog to amplify in a more superior way of what I myself have been trying to convey thus far.

In response to my apparent few but devoted listeners and fans, the above synopsis is why I have been so silent on my own blog since my blockbuster "Open Letter to Rush Limbaugh." Recently, I re-read that "open communique" to myself to see just how much my mind has been even more educated, purified, and refined by further critical inquiries. I would have to say that since that time, over the span of the last two years, my mind has been exercised and developed to the point of at least 12 times that. I will have to owe that in large part to the combination of fervent prayer, more exacting and critical reading of the Old and New Testaments, and the discovery and reading of one book -- Rulers of Evil.


Why is this one book so significant to me, and why has the continuing comprehension it engenders made it difficult (nay, next to impossible) to communicate effectively with others? Allow me to demonstrate this via another reader's observations:

"I'm finding it increasingly difficult to discuss current events with people who haven't read it."

Let me go one further. I find it "next to impossible to discuss anything with people who haven't read it." So there, maybe you all now understand my apparent silence at my own blog. So, for me to continue effectively at my own blog, I will now require all who wish to converse with me here and expect further comment from me on "matters of the world," to at least complete one reading of ROE, and pledge to read two or more in the future. Tom Bell (fellow Texan from the good vicinity of Magnolia) has already communicated to me that he has read ROE thrice! Whew..... That's better than me, for I am still in the process of my second reading. Any further posting by said blogmaster will only commence when I determine that the majority of my listernership has read and comprehends ROE at least once through. We must all be on the "same sheet of music" before it is of any more value to proceed hence. If this can be achieved, I plan to invite the author Saussy himself to join this blog and our discussions.

Vox Day in his column "God's Plan For America," asks the rhetorical, "does He in fact have a plan?" Yes, He most definitely does. In Jesus' paradoxical "Not peace, but a sword..." Saussy in a similar vein reveals history and exegetical evidence from scripture that our Lord Creator has put into place via our Christian founders and fathers of America, devices in our founding documents and codes, embedded but not necessarily concealed or hidden for the "children of God" to live according to his will. The beginnings of this instruction is contained in Rulers of Evil: Useful Knowledge About Governing Bodies.

Let's get cracking people...

20 Comments:

  • At 12:07 PM, June 05, 2006, Blogger Seven Star Hand said…

    Hey Fooser,

    Most have totally missed the point that the Gnostic texts and others are making. First, they refer to symbolic males and females, hence the philosophical masculine and feminine nature and character. All the Gnostic texts are philosophical and symbolic treatises, not literal narratives. When you try to interpret any of these ancient texts (including the Bible) as literal, you will always come to the wrong conclusions.

    Read verse twelve of the Gospel of Thomas to understand who I am...

    You may not initially agree with everything I reveal, but be a little patient with my long-winded presentation of what I have waited a very long time to be able to say. I promise to amaze and enlighten.

    Contrary to those who strive to assert that the DaVinci Code created the term, symbology is an ancient philosophical technology and I am a real life symbologist. Likewise, the upper-level members of secret societies such as Freemasons, Rosicrucians, Illumanti, and the Vatican are symbologists. Keeping their "craft" secretive and misunderstood is a purposeful ploy designed to hide the truth about ancient wisdom and the symbology used to model, encapsulate, and encode it. The title "mason" is itself a symbolic allusion to those who work with the "Philosophers' Stone" which is the symbolic name given to an ancient body of symbology, hence "Masons" are workers of "stone."

    Read Proverbs 9:1 below to better understand this allusion.

    Wisdom has built Her house. She has carved out Her seven pillars.

    Notice that "wisdom" is referred to as "Her" and "She", as in Sophia and Miriam (the Magdala), and that "She" has "hewn" "Her" "seven pillars" (of stone)? Read my Home Page to see what those seven pillars of "stone" have always referred to, contrary to what religions and mysticism have said for millennia.

    Peace...

    Here is the key to understanding what the Vatican and Papacy truly fear...

    Pay close attention, profundity knocks at the door, listen for the key. Be Aware! Scoffing causes blindness...

    Here's a real hot potato! Eat it up, digest it, and then feed it's bones to the hungry...

    There's much more to the story of the Vatican's recent machinations than meets the eye. It's not the DaVinci Code or Gospel of Judas per se, but the fact that people have now been motivated to seek out the unequivocal truth about an age of deception, exactly when they expect me to appear. These recent controversies are spurring people to reevaluate the Vatican/Papacy and the religions that Rome spawned, at the worst possible time for them.

    Remember, "I come as a thief..." ?

    The DaVinci Code novel and movie are no more inaccurate as literal versions of history than the New Testament. The primary sub-plot involved purposeful symbology being used to encode hidden meanings, exactly like the Bible and related texts. In other words, none of these stories represent the literal truth. This is the common and pivotal fact of all such narratives about ancient Hebrew and Christian history. Debating whether the DaVinci Code, Gnostic texts, or the Bible are accurate history is a purposeful ploy designed to hide the truth by directing your inquiry away from the heart of the matter.

    There is a foolproof way to verify the truth and expose centuries-old religious deceptions. It also proves why we can no longer let the Vatican tell us what to think about ancient history or much else. It is the common thread connecting why the ancient Hebrews, Yahad/Essene, Jews, Gnostics, Cathars, Templars, Dead Sea Scrolls, DaVinci Code, and others have been targets of Rome’s ire and evil machinations. The Vatican and its secret society cohorts don’t want you to understand that the ancient Hebrew symbology in all of these texts purposely encodes and exposes the truth about them. Furthermore, the structure of ancient wisdom symbology verifiably encodes the rules to decode messages built with it. This is what they most fear you will discover.

    If the Bible represented the literal truth or even accurate history, there would be no need for faith in the assertions of deceptive and duplicitous clergy and their ilk. It is undeniable the New Testament is awash with ancient Hebrew symbolism and allegory. The same is evidenced in the Old Testament, Dead Sea Scrolls, Gnostic texts, biblical apocrypha, Quran, DaVinci Code, and other related sources. All ancient religious, mystical, and wisdom texts have been shrouded in mystery for millennia for one primary reason: The ability to understand their widely evidenced symbology was lost in antiquity. How do we finally solve these ages-old mysteries? To recast an often-used political adage: It’s [the] symbology, stupid!

    It is beyond amazing that the Vatican still tries to insist the Gospels are the literal truth. Every miracle purported for Jesus has multiple direct symbolic parallels in the Old Testament, Apocalypse, Dead Sea Scrolls, and other symbolic narratives and traditions. Recasting the symbolism of earlier Hebrew texts as literal events in the New Testament is one of the central deceptions associated with Christianity. This is part of the secret knowledge held by the ancient Gnostics, Templars, Cathars, and others, which is presented with dramatic effect in the DaVinci Code. None of these narratives or stories were ever intended as the literal truth. This fact is the key to unraveling many ages-old mysteries and exposing the truth about the Vatican's long-term deceptions.

    Moreover, the following Washington Post article (The Book of Bart) describes how many changes and embellishments were made to New Testament texts over the centuries, unequivocally demonstrating they are not original, infallible, or truthful. When you combine proof that the New Testament Gospels are not wholly literal with proof that these texts were heavily reworked in the early years of Christianity, you are left with only one possible conclusion. The Vatican has long lied to everyone about the central tenets and history of Christianity. This revelation also proves they are not the Creator’s representatives but Her long-time opponents. The recent hoopla over the Gospel of Judas and DaVinci Code demonstrates they are still desperately trying to deceive the world and obfuscate their true nature and activities.

    It's no wonder the Vatican fears the truth more than anything else. As further proof of these assertions, seek to understand the symbolic significance of my name (Seven Star Hand) and you will have proof beyond disproof that Jews, Christians, and Muslims have long been duped by the great deceivers I warned humanity about over the millennia. What then is the purpose of "faith" but to keep good people from seeking to understand the truth?

    Now comes justice, hot on its heels... (symbolism...)

    Not only do I talk the talk, I walk the walk...
    Here is Wisdom!!

    Revelations from the Apocalypse

     
  • At 4:33 PM, June 05, 2006, Blogger HazimD said…

    I'm on it, gimme a few weeks. Thanks for the direction.

     
  • At 4:41 PM, June 05, 2006, Blogger HazimD said…

    Be right on it, gimme a few weeks. Thanks

     
  • At 4:24 PM, July 03, 2006, Anonymous Tom Bell said…

    Keep posting , Dread. Someday all this will sink in to people. Folks, read the damn book, "Rulers of Evil." Read it ten times, if needed. It will open your eyes as to what is happening in your society and the world today. Bought a copy for my daughter, who is college bound. The book is well researched and documented. It also proves Dread is no kook as some on Vox's blog believe.

     
  • At 4:27 PM, July 03, 2006, Blogger Tom Bell said…

    Read the book, folks. It will open your eyes as to what is happening in this society. Dread is no kook as some on Vox's blog seem to think.

     
  • At 4:29 PM, July 03, 2006, Blogger Tom Bell said…

    Read the book . It will open your eyes ao to what is happening in your society and your world. Dread is no kook as some seem to think.

     
  • At 11:49 AM, July 13, 2006, Blogger Salt said…

    I now have the book. It is clarifying certain suspicions I have had and giving me new knowledge and insight, while as another source, adding more confirmation to that which I know.

    God ordained. I have not gotten to that but I surmise that (without any great detail) as 'all these things must come to pass' - it (subject of the book) is necesaary (prophetic) and therefore permitted by God. Who am I to argue (fight against)? Also, that it is just and proper to remain 'righteous' is not license to argue (activist protest) but lends to 'coming out of her' (individual; leave me alone (non participation); may require personal fight to achieve).

    The book is great reading.

     
  • At 1:45 PM, July 13, 2006, Blogger Salt said…

    Hit a spot in the book that has clarified something I have always wondered about.

    [see Man for all Seasons, great film]

    Why was Sir Thomas More, a one time very good friend of King Henry VIII, executed? As More was silent on the troubles of Henry wishing to divorce Catherine and marry Anne Boylen, why did not Henry just leave his friend silent?

    More (patron saint of lawyers) knew the law and that his silence was his safety.

    Other than imprison him as coercion to get him to accede to Henry's wish that he 'come along for the sake of fellowship', the King could do no more to him. Was Henry manipulated? And if so by whom (or what?)? More could not be manipulated as he was dead silent on the issue.

    More was an ardent Catholic and used the law as his shield. More was widely known to be honest. When he was a judge he was not corruptable.

    So, why execute his friend?

    From the film, More was talking and mentioned 'the Pope'. His adversary said "Bishop of Rome".

    More: "Bishop of Rome if you prefer. Does not alter his authority."

    More can be seen as personification of Catholicism in England.

    What better to aid the return to the Catholic flock of heretic Protestants than a noble, honest, and uncorrupted Catholic martyr.

    Saussy is getting my attention.

     
  • At 7:28 PM, July 15, 2006, Blogger Salt said…

    The WH, the perverted power.

    It's said that one knows when one is being told true and when one is being lied to.

    Saussy, it appears, is right on point.

    This book is pulling many seemingly unconnected things I have studied into an almost perfect balance.

    And Madonna says she became a christian - then went off and studied cabalah.

     
  • At 6:14 PM, July 16, 2006, Blogger fooser77 said…

    This book is pulling many seemingly unconnected things I have studied into an almost perfect balance.

    Salt, words taken from my very own lips as I delving into it chapter by chapter. Almost perfect, could not be better phrased. As much as has been revealed thus far in ROE, still much is needed to be studied and research as the author on many occasions throughout this work, has encouraged the reader to further engage. When you finish ROE, I am sure as others have expressed before me, that one does in fact experience a paradigm shift in their thought processes.

     
  • At 7:05 PM, July 16, 2006, Blogger Salt said…

    Dread, I'm engaged in some conversation - well... just check my site... http://rocknacl.blogspot.com
    "It's not out there, it's in there"


    People just do not get it.

     
  • At 9:48 PM, July 19, 2006, Blogger DrFix said…

    Just got the book today. Tore into the package and started reading. Finally took a much needed break. I'm not the reader I used to be but its been well worth the trip so far.

    From my readings about Loyola's little system of self examination and preparation etc. you'd be excused for not thinking it was a modern form of "creative visualization". This is as occultic as can be! I belive the olde worde was "witchcraft".

    Another point I found interesting was that the same year that the Vatican established an "embassy" was the same year that forfeiture laws were boosted. Hmmmmmm.

    A lot of ground is covered thats been mentioned in countless other books and tracts, without going into excessive detail in any ONE particular branch, he is weaving the story together.

    More to read and certainly more to contemplate.

     
  • At 8:41 AM, July 29, 2006, Blogger Salt said…

    Dread, you would appreciate the book 'The Search' by Dr. Ron Charles. You can google it.

    EP and I were having a discussion concerning it at Vox's and EP bailed, being the good Catholic he is.

    Though the Luciferian system is not the subject of the book, it does detail certain things that are of interest concerning it.

    My opinion is that you would highly enjoy it.

     
  • At 9:24 PM, August 06, 2006, Blogger fooser77 said…

    Salt, Dr. Charles' book looks quite interesting. Especially the section:

    XI. Mother of God
    + Is Mary the “Mother of God” or just the mother of Jesus, her son?
    + Why is the doctrine of “Mary, the Mother of God” responsible for the birth of Islam?

    Do you think it just might have something to do with Fatima? I will have to put that on my wishlist. More and more books I would like in .pdf format. Not just for the ease of storage and access, but even more for quick search for reference purposes.

    Dr. Fix, I miss our Skype sessions. Salt, we need to schedule a Skype conference that maybe I can host between the three of us. Of course, Tom and Hazim are invited as well. If you don't have Skype, then get it. A high speed connection will prolly be required for best performance. Everyone let me know what you think of this.

    Tom, your daughter is going to be so far ahead of the curve, that it may be a wee little scary to her. But all for the better.

    Hazim, I'm curious as to your progress. Let me know...

    I'm working on another post. Athor Pel has provoked me to muse a bit on Benny Franklin. This guy is an enigma. But again, maybe he isn't at all...

    Stay tuned...

    P.S. What does everyone think of my new pic? The other one was taken in 2001/2002 I believe, so I thought I might spruce things up a bit. Yes my hair has gotten considerably longer. It's that "head banger" in me I guess. In between the two pics (I believe in 2003/2004), I went for a G.I. (practically Marine regulation) cut for a job. Since, it's grown out again. My present employer apparently does'nt mind...

     
  • At 8:42 AM, August 10, 2006, Anonymous Salt said…

    I'm up for a Skype session.

    As to Fatima, I have no clue.

    Dread, though it is indicated that 'The Search' is in eBook, I have not seen it. I have a hardback... glad I do too.

     
  • At 6:14 PM, September 06, 2006, Anonymous Jay D. said…

    The Annu signature may be older than you think. Here is an example from a galaxy far, far away.

     
  • At 3:38 PM, September 08, 2006, Blogger DrFix said…

    If we're going to do any Skyping... I'd suggest a time that we all can agree on that would be most convenient.

     
  • At 10:06 PM, September 09, 2006, Blogger Salt said…

    The Annu signature may be older than you think. Here is an example from a galaxy far, far away.

    The past intruding into the present; Hollywood.

    Naturally.

     
  • At 10:00 AM, October 07, 2006, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Just got ROE, near page 100 now, beyond my greatest expectations. A number of Tupper's conclusions are similar to conclusions I've come to based on separate observations, this is SO engrossing and enriching.

    Dread, I see what you mean about difficulty discussing ANYTHING with others now, this should be required reading in all high school world history and/or American history classes.

    Hazim

     
  • At 1:21 PM, December 20, 2006, Anonymous P.T. Barnum said…

    LOL

     

Post a Comment

<< Home